The Revolution will be Drawn: Pages 336-37 of Marjane Satrapi’s THE COMPLETE PERSEPOLIS.

Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis saga has, among its many accomplishments, a wonderfully varied panel-page layout. Instead of following the standard American comics panel layout of six or nine panels, three panels forming a tier, and three tiers to a page, Persepolis refreshingly deviates from formula, using six or nine paneled grid page besides splash pages, two panel pages, pages with different shaped panels on the same page, square panels, stacked panels, and so on. For such a monochromatic color palette, Satrapi’s graphic novels offer a plethora of panel-page type. The type of panel-page layout used on a specific page is always deliberate, aiding in conveying information or inspiring pathos. When it comes to markings on a comic page, every line, from those that appear to those that are absent, are intentional. Establishing what something is, how it functions in context, and why it exists are part of the fun of studying comics. Pages 336 and 337 of Pantheon’s first American edition of The Complete Persepolis are a positive case study in how page-panel layout effectively contributes to Persepolis‘s overarching narrative themes of duality and revolution. These two pages convey, in both content and framing, a revolution. A minor one, compared to the Iranian Revolution, but still a revolution all the same.

Dualism is an overarching textual and visual theme of the Persepolis saga. Opposing dualities, and the tensions that arise from living in and between two opposing dualities, prevail as textual themes: revolutionaries v. the Shah, revolutionaries v. the fundamentalists, Persian v. Arab culture, secularism v. sacracity, West v. Iran, treatment of men v. treatment of women, one’s bourgeoisie lifestyle v. one’s radical beliefs, assimilation v. loyalty to one’s roots, and so on and so forth. Visually, many panels contain some type (or types) of visual contrast both within the panel, when compared to other panels, or when compared to other pages and cultural images (examples include the top left panel on page 6; the middle panel on 13; the two panels on pages 102; all of the panels on page 279; the two panels on page 305; and the bottom panels of pages 153, 250, and 281 contrast with Michelangelo’s Pietà). And, of course, the most apparent duality on the page: Persepolis‘s black-and-white color scheme. Yet, just as the black ink and white page create a visual tension, contrast can also simultaneously create harmony. Page 336’s layout is a good example of this.

A (very poor) picture of page 336.

Page 336 contains eight panels: two panels a tier, four tiers total. Each panel is the same shape and size, so that the single gutter separating the panels on each tier is attached to the one above or below it. The center of the page, therefore, consists of a single gutter, dividing the page in half. Not only is this centering visually appealing to the eye, but the page is symmetrically balanced as well. This single gutter creates a y-axis, and along this axis, the panel on the left reflects the panel on the right, and vice versa. While the scene within each panel is not geometrically reflected with the panel beside it — if that were the case, the characters of Marjane and Gila on the left side of the left panel would be on the right side of the right panel. This is not the case (nor should it be, as that would distract from the narrative of the story and break from the internal rules of the reality already established in Persepolis). Instead of geometric reflection, Satrapi reflects the panels on the left from the panels on the right in a different way. She reflects the panels contextually.

Middle-school geometry made fun and relevant, thanks to Marjane Satrapi!

The page’s context is that Behzad Radi, a colleague of Marjane and Gila’s at the economics magazine they work out, is seen as a hero by the two women because he was arrested by the government for two weeks on account of drawing a bearded man having his beard climbed by another character (Satrapi 334). Radi, however, knocks himself off his own pedestal by mansplaining: he speaks for and over his wife, Mandana, every time Marjane or Gila ask her a question. The term “mansplaining” is inspired by Rebecca Solnit (who will be speaking at Hofstra the Monday we come back from break) after her 2008 essay “Men Explain Things to Me.” The internet invented the term, so it is only fitting that the internet provide us with a definition of “mansplaining,”

Corgis, on the other hand, are more than welcome to explain myself to me or anyone else. #corgsplaining

The panel-page layout is divided in an oppositional way: one panel against another. In the panels themselves, the same layout is seen, as Marjane and Gila are divided from Behzad and Mandana by the table. The table serves as a divider, or a battle line, where Marjane and Gila are annoyed with/against Behzad. The table is a physical dividing line between Behzad’s ignorance and his co-workers’ annoyance. Like the background and couches, the table is all white. The only black comes from the clothing and hair of the characters. Despite the resemblance between the characters, all in black attire, the different “teams” are established through the difference in clothing: the left team, Marjane and Gila, have short hair, short tops, and wide pants. Behzad has the same appearance, but Mandana, the suffering wife, has long hair (pulled back) and a long tunic. Mandana is more traditionally feminine in appearance. Her husband is traditional in his appearance. In this way, the viewpoint of the rival teams is reflected in their differ attire: Marjane and Gila are nontraditional in their belief that a woman can and should speak for herself, whereas Behzad (and, by extension, Mandana) represent traditional gender roles, where the husband’s word is the final word. The teams are assembled and, once Mandana fetches the tea and cakes and the food is set in a symmetric order resembling a soccer/sports field (the tea at each corner, the box of cakes in the center), the field is set for battle.

Remove the goal boxes at either end, keep the four corners, and change the center circle into a square and the soccer field mirrors the table on page 336.

The only sequential progression of time shown on the field. The tea glasses are full on the left panel on the second tier and gradually the contents decrease until there is none left on the right panel in the third tier. The next tier, the last, features a reversal. In the left panel, Mandana, instead of now being asked the questions, asks one of her own. In the right panel, Marjane and Gila, mouths agape (at Mandana speaking up, or at the being asked if they have children, or both?), are spoken over by Behzad. Instead of speaking for his wife, he now speaks for his guests to his wife. Behzad is mansplaining on behalf of Marjane and Gila. Behzad’s swollen, blackened eye, the mark of his punishment from the tyrannical government, is now closed for the first time on this page. Perhaps this is meant to illustrate how, symbolically, Behzad has a blind eye to his own chauvinism and the anger his guests feel towards him. The reversal seen on this last tier is cognitively stimulating, but also telling in terms of content. Their opinion of Behzad, who Marjane says “was my hero for twenty days” on the first panel of the next page, is permanently reversed in the eyes of his co-workers and the reader. Behzad has lost won the battle but lost the war — to himself.

Satrapi’s harmonious symmetry of the page and panels compositions is contrasted by the antagonistic context of the scene. The reader is better able to cognitively “see” the ideological battle, angered feelings, and reversal of opinion that takes place over the course of the scene. The page, content-wise, is as divided as the panels are along the y-axis: there is the before and the after. There is a change: a change of esteem. This change of esteem sparks Marjane’s revolutionary change on page 337.

A picture of page 337. Pages 336 and 337 complement one another beyond the fact that both have had the disservice of receiving my photographic treatment.

Page 337 visually contrasts page 336. Where 336 consisted of four tiers with two panels a tier, page 337 contains three tiers with a panel per tier. This new page layout creates two horizontal gutters. The page does not contain a y-axis, but instead two gutters, divided along the x-axis.

The reader’s mind has to readjust to this new layout. Thought page 337 is also symmetrical, for the three panels are of equal shape, size, and distance apart, it contrasts with the previous page in how it is symmetrical. The panels are wider and of a longer length, and the tiers are therefore bigger in size to page 336. This creates a “widescreen” like effect, showing the larger world (and larger worldview) Marjane and Gila inhabit. Furthermore, the dominant color is not white like before, but black. The background, shadows and clothing are all black, whereas the cars and skin tone are white, with the physical landscape on the bottommost panel being outlines in white. The black background may be meant to denote that it is nighttime and that the Radis household was lit, but regardless, it still contrasts sharply with the dominating whiteness of the previous page. Further contrast is made through the change in POV. Unlike the static, same perspective used on all eight panels on page 336, 337 changes the perspective in each panel. The first panel takes place behind the women inside Gila’s car. The next panel has the reader seeing the characters from the front of the car, but outside the car, as the motion lines and shading on the car to the left of Marjane illustrates. The final panel on page 337 is again behind the women, but also behind their car: the reader is on the highway, seeing the cars and landscape of Tehran. Gila’s car is moving (again, see the motion lines of the second tier panel) and so, too, is the POV. But what are we moving towards?

The visual contrast between pages 336 and 337 are day-and-night. The content of the two pages, however…

Marjane and Gila are contextually moving towards their homes (and away from Behzad’s provincial sexism), but Marjane, and therefore the reader, are moving cognitively as well. The reader must reorient, due to the contrasting layout and coloring between pages 336 and 337. Yet, this reorientation works to the page’s advantage as it mirrors the reorientation within Marjane. The scene’s content consists of Marjane venting her frustration at Behzadi’s hypocrisy: the hypocrisy being that he believes in freedom of expression but won’t let his wife speak on her own behalf (337). When Gila notes that this is not unique to Iranian men but, in fact, even Western men mansplain, Marjane rebuts that in Iran the law privileges men over women. Marjane (presumably, given that she is given the last speech bubble in the previous panel) goes into a lengthy speech, listing how women are legally oppressed under Iranian law. The last three sentences of Marjane’s speech in the last panel on page 337 are written in a larger font than that of page 336 or any text prior on page 337. Marjane says, “Do you realize??,” then her font increases even more at the final, climactic words: “I CAN’T TAKE THIS ANYMORE. I WANT TO LEAVE THIS COUNTRY!” (337). Marjane and the reader have reached their destination, the climax of the two pages: the declaration of revolution.

Despite visually contrasting, page 337 compliments 336 in terms of story narrative. Page 337 completes 336, being not just a continuation of the page prior but completing a revolution within Marjane. Marjane revolts from the sexism and overall oppression Iran places on her and decides to return to the West in order to live her live to her full potential. She makes the decision to leave and acts on it in the final four pages of Persepolis. She divorces Reza, gets accepted into the School of Decorative Arts in Strasbourg, spends her last days traveling Iran, paying her respects to her grandfather and Uncle Anoosh, and enjoying her last days with her grandmother and parents before departing from Tehran’s airport. The set-up for these final four pages are found in the visually contrasting but narratively complimenting pages of 336 and 337. Those two pages create a yin-yang: visually opposites, but creating a whole, and illustrating the cyclical revolution within Marjane. From her adolescent fascination with the West’s punk movement and materialism, to feeling so alienated in the West that she returns to Iran depressed and dejected, to her frustration with Iran and resolve to return to the West this time as a more confident and ready adult, Marjane has come full circle. The revolution on pages 336 and 337 are the last stages of the evolution Marjane has taken throughout Persepolis. Marjane has grown-up and come to her own.

Of course, there is a cost to every revolution. With the Iranian Revolution, it was the lost of lives and subsequent, with adolescent rebellion it is the lost of innocence. The last tier on page 337 illustrates what Marjane loses in emigrating from Iran The detailed landscape of the city, the mountains, and foliage foreshadows what Marjane will lose, and must, in leaving Tehran for “[f]reedom has a price” (341). Marjane will lose the physical and material world that made her: her home country and childhood home. She will lose the comfort of being an Iranian in Iran and of her family and friends. She will lose what is natural to her and her identity. Still, Marjane continues. The revolution must go on, and in Persepolis, the revolution is drawn.




10 thoughts on “The Revolution will be Drawn: Pages 336-37 of Marjane Satrapi’s THE COMPLETE PERSEPOLIS.”

  1. As always, I enjoyed reading your blog post! I find it fascinating that you analyzed the physical makeup of the comics themselves; this is something I did not think of analyzing in my own blog post. While the imagery and the text within each page tell a story, the characteristics of the comics tell a story as well.

    I agree that Persepolis is visually appealing; I personally like the clean lines, especially those you pointed out on page 336. I find it interesting that this page is starkly different from 337, where there are less panels and more black ink. While the storyline progresses, so does the experience of the reader.

    I believe there is more to analyze in comics than in basic text novels. Not only does the author tell you a story through their words, but, as we’ve seen both in Maus and in Persepolis, the reader must read between the lines (or the panels) to get the full story the author is trying to convey. I hope we discuss this idea more in class, because you have sparked my interest in it!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you for your kind words. I am so glad you enjoyed my post!

      As you said, I love that the reader has to “read between the panels” in order to understand what the author is saying. It’s one of the features I love about comics: I like the sense of closure. Most films, TV, and computer/video games have as little closure as possible. You’re just supposed to pay attention and accept. I like being a part of the world building, you know? It makes the experience more personal and memorable.

      Thanks again for your kind words. They are greatly appreciated!


  2. Hi there! Your analysis was so incredibly in-depth and intriguing to read. I loved your discussion of visual tension and harmony–not only in panel structure and composition but Satrapi’s use of black ink on a white canvas. Satrapi is making a whole other argument within her visual choices that I haven’t really acknowledged. Your argument also flowed seamlessly into mansplaining (your meme choice made me laugh) and I also wanted to thank you for the plug for Rebecca Solnit. (I didn’t even know she was behind the concept of mansplaining and I’m so pumped she’s coming to Hofstra!)

    Your final notes were particularly powerful: “…in Persepolis, the revolution is drawn.” What a great way to tie in your argument and themes that Satrapi has aimed to get across to her readership.

    Wonderful insights!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Hey you! 🙂 Thank you so much for your comment: it means a lot. I am so glad you enjoyed my argument. I was really worried my mansplaining digression was just that: a digression. I am glad you thought it fit into the argument. (Between you and me, I may have just wanted to insert a cute corgi and feminist meme in my essay). Have you read/heard of Rebecca Solnit? I love her essays. They are funny while also being immaculately constructed and argued. I aspire to that level of eloquence! If you can see her, I definitely recommend it. She is a total badass intellectual.

      I am glad you like my ending line. Sometimes I have no idea how to stop talking/writing. Kind of grasping at straws then, so I am glad it actually worked out.

      Thank you again for your comment! Have a wonderful rest of break! 🙂


  3. Hey there!

    Once again another blog post that keeps me wanting to read more!

    Your blog posts never fail to amaze me because of your implausible analyzation skills. Not only that but your choice of memes adds a perfect touch to depict your humor. The corgi meme really got to me because recently I was on Facebook and I stumbled upon a video where there was a legitimate corgi race. Here’s the link if you want to watch it (trust me you want to watch it, it will make you smile) –>

    Any who, back to your blog post…while I was reading, a lightbulb flickered because what you wrote made complete sense to me due to your textual evidence and support. I would also like to point out how your depth of analyzation gave me that aha moment multiple times throughout your post.

    I mean I guess I can say that I’m good at paying attention to details (noticing every little thing possible known to man), but the part where you stated and I quote. “the food is set in a symmetric order resembling a soccer/sports field (the tea at each corner, the box of cakes in the center), the field is set for battle”, that is one of my favorite analyzations of yours because the simple placement of items can symbolize so much more.

    Great job once again!!!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hello friend!

      So glad you liked my post: thanks for your comment! Looks like we were both in a meme mood with our posts. Great minds think alike. 😉

      Oh my God, that corgi video. It is perfect! Dogs are perfect. Given the opportunity, I will SO write a post on how corgi races are the epitome of fighting of resisting oppression and why our class should have a field trip to one. Can we do this, please?

      Oh wow, you’re going to make me blush. In all honesty, during my reading, I kept adding tabs to pages I liked. I had a sense of why I liked certain pages, but I had no idea why I liked pages 336 and 337 as much as I did. I pretty much used this assignment to figure out why I liked this so much. It was funny, sure, but I had no idea why it stood out to me even after I finished the book. Glad it didn’t bore anyone. I used to play soccer as a kid, and trust me, middle school girls on a soccer field is the equivalent of modern warfare! Who knew that would pay of in my college writing, lol!

      Always a pleasure to hear from you! Have a great rest of break! 😀

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Not surprisingly, you offer a compelling and wonderfully supported analysis. I love that you contextualize by employing other imagery, taking up Satrapi’s implicit charge to question the dominance of any form of communication. The page layout discussion is great. It’s so easy to get complacent about panel positions and drawn along in the narrative that one misses the work of visual juxtaposition and subversion. The work of juxtaposition (within comics) to subvert and suggest social change is explore in an essay called, “The Guerilla Girls’ Comic Politics of Subversion” by Anne Teresa Demo. It’s a little heavy on Burkean theory, but if you’re interested, it’s in Women’s Studies in Communication, 23(2), 2000.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Prof. Miller! Thank you for your comment: it always means a lot. I am glad my page analysis worked (I wasn’t sure it was going to make anit iinteresting post, but I was fascinated by those pages, so I just went for it). The Demo piece sounds REALLY fascinating. I already looked it up and look forward to reading it over the weekend. Thank you for the rerecommendation! 🙂


  5. Hey! Just wanted to let you know that I thought your blog was extremely helpful in understanding the imagery aspect of the novel, and how when discussing it through a lens of communication, it allows the reader to furthermore interpret Satrapi’s true meaning.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Hey, Anthony! I really appreciate your comment: it made my day! Glad my post was helpful in any way. I never know if I ambailed rambling or making a point, so it is nice to know it was the latter. Thanks again for youra comment. See you this afternoon!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s